Joshua Ward-Hibbert vs Luke Bambridge Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W W L L
Form
L L W L L L W L L LHead-2-Head: Ward-Hibbert 1 - 2 Bambridge
They have played 7 sets in total, with Ward-Hibbert winning 2 and Bambridge winning 5. The last match between Ward-Hibbert and Bambridge was at the Great Britain F9, 07-09-2015, Second, Hard with Joshua Ward-Hibbert getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Joshua Ward-Hibbert | 1 |
| Luke Bambridge | 2 |
Great Britain F9(07-09-2015)
3
6
6
3
6
4
| Ward-Hibbert | Stats | Bambridge |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 588 | Highest Rank | 481 |
| 31 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 50% (81-82) | Career Total W/L | 52% (176-161) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,650 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ward-Hibbert VS Bambridge H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(3) 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Ward-Hibbert VS Bambridge H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 30 | Games Won | 38 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Joshua Ward-Hibbert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Liam Broady
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
85%
(
52 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Appelgren
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
0
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Dubarenco
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
Player
Joshua Paris
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Hoyt
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Dolezel
Player
Joshua Ward-Hibbert
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
50
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Luke Bambridge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Luke Bambridge
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Luke Bambridge
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
50 of
104)
14
Aces
11
13
Double Faults
6
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
59 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
42 of
121)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Luke Bambridge
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Escobar
Player
Luke Bambridge
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Luke Bambridge
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Bambridge
Player
Justin Boulais
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Luke Bambridge
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (81/82) | Win/Loss | 52% (176/161) |
| 49% (179/190) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (407/378) |
| 50% (1772/1778) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3878/3763) |
| 59% (48/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (91/77) |
| 36% (5/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (32/25) |
| 38% (16/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (44/43) |
| 46% (12/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (9/16) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 103 | Aces Total | 1356 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 81 | Total Double Faults | 678 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 555.64 | Average Opponent Rank | 583.45 |
| 63% (859/1361) | 1st Serve % | 55% (6930/12637) |
| 69% (593/859) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (5225/6930) |
| 43% (215/502) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2816/5706) |
| 37% (35/94) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (402/973) |
| 34% (448/1301) | Return Points Win % | 36% (4372/12151) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (4/5) | Challenger W/L | 44% (42/54) |
| 51% (77/74) | Futures W/L | 56% (131/102) |
| 49% (79/160) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (173/334) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 34% (21/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (73/133) |
| 57% (26/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (55/112) |
| 88% (77/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (183/149) |
| 12% (77/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (183/34) |
| 14% (86/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (154/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
